🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to reopen talks with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if discussions restart.

The American leader last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and continues the final solution to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the identical tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the face of this invasion."